Difference between revisions of "Policy:Guiding Principles"

Revision as of 00:49, 19 March 2022

These principles were inherited from the open letter which lead to the founding of the project:

Disconnecting the population of a country from the Internet is a disproportionate and inappropriate sanction, since it hampers their access to the very information that might lead them to withdraw support for acts of war and leaves them with access to only the information their own government chooses to furnish.

The effectiveness of sanctions should be evaluated relative to predefined goals. Ineffective sanctions waste effort and willpower and convey neither unity nor conviction.

Sanctions should be focused and precise. They should minimize the chance of unintended consequences or collateral damage. Disproportionate or over-broad sanctions risk fundamentally alienating populations.

Military and propaganda agencies and their information infrastructure are potential targets of sanctions.

While these principles represent the starting-point of the project, they are not immutable, and may be refined by the community over time.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 * Military and propaganda agencies and their information infrastructure are potential targets of sanctions.
-* The Internet, due to its transnational nature and consensus-driven multistakeholder system of governance, currently does not easily lend itself to the imposition of sanctions in national conflicts.
+While these principles represent the starting-point of the project, they are not immutable, and may be refined by the community over time.
-* It is inappropriate and counterproductive for governments to attempt to compel Internet governance mechanisms to impose sanctions outside of the community’s multistakeholder decision-making process.
-* There are nonetheless appropriate, effective, and specific sanctions the Internet governance community may wish to consider in its deliberative processes.